City of Manteca – 2010 Report
to Consumers on Water Quality Date of
Report: May 2011
(El informe contiene información
importante sobre su agua potable. Tradúzalo o hable con alguien que lo
entienda bien.)
The Safe Drinking Water Act requires that utilities
issue a water quality report to consumers
in addition to other notices that may be required by law.
This report details where our water comes from, what it contains, and
the risks our water testing and treatment are designed to prevent.
The City of
In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink,
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the Department of
Public Health (Department) prescribe regulations that limit the amount of
certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. Department
regulations also establish limits for contaminants in bottled water that
must provide the same protection for public health.
Drinking water, including
bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain small amounts of some
contaminants. The presence of
contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk.
More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be
obtained by calling the USEPA’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline (1-800-426-4791)
or on the Internet at www.epa.gov/safewater.
Sources of drinking water (both tap water and
bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs
and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the
ground, it dissolves natural deposits of minerals and radioactive material
and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or from
human activity. Contaminants
that may be present in source water include:
·
Microbial contaminants such as
viruses and bacteria, which may come from sewage treatment plants, septic
systems, agricultural livestock operations and wildlife.
·
Inorganic contaminants such as
salts and metals, which can be naturally-occurring or result from urban
storm runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas
production, mining or farming.
·
Pesticides and herbicides,
which may come from a variety of sources such as agriculture, stormwater
runoff and residential uses.
·
Organic chemical contaminants
including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals that are byproducts of
industrial processes and petroleum production, and can also come from gas
stations, urban stormwater runoff, agricultural application and septic
systems.
·
Radioactive contaminants,
which can be naturally-occurring or resulting from oil and gas production
and mining activities.
Some people may be more
vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population.
Immuno-compromised persons such as persons with cancer undergoing
chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with
HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and infants can be
particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about
drinking water from their health care providers.
USEPA/Centers
for Disease Control
(CDC) guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection
by Cryptosporidium are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline
(1-800-426-4791).
NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER
REGULATION COMPLIANCE
This report was prepared by City of
CURRENT WATER SOURCE
The City of
FUTURE WATER SOURCE
The City of
SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT
·
Groundwater:
Source water assessments (SWA) were completed in
December, 2001 for all existing City wells. New wells have SWA completed
prior to the well producing any water for consumption by customers. The
wells are considered most vulnerable to confirmed leaking underground
storage tanks, gas stations, chemical/petroleum processing/storage
facilities, metal plating/finishing/fabricating facilities, automobile
body/repair shops and sewer collection systems.
For inquires about the
source water assessment call the City of Manteca, Public Works Department at
(209) 456-8400 located at 1001 West Center Street, Manteca, CA or the
Department of Public Health at (209) 948-7696.
·
Surface Water:
Source water assessments
were completed in September, 2001.
The Woodward Reservoir/Stanislaus River source is considered most
vulnerable to recreational activities at Woodward Reservoir, confined animal
facilities (dairy), cattle grazing, and wastewater disposal.
For inquires about the source water assessment call the Department of
Public Health at (209) 948-7696.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
The
public can participate in decisions that affect their water by attending
City Council meetings when water related topics are scheduled for action.
Council meetings are held in the Council Chambers,
CONCERNING NITRATE IN OUR WATER
Nitrate in drinking water at levels above 45 ppm is a health risk for
infants of less than six months of age. Such nitrate levels in drinking
water can interfere with the capacity of the infant’s blood to carry oxygen,
resulting in a serious illness; symptoms include shortness of breath and
blueness of the skin. Nitrate levels above 45 ppm may also affect the
ability of the blood to carry oxygen in other individuals, such as pregnant
women and those with certain specific enzyme deficiencies.
If you are caring for an infant, or you are pregnant, you should ask
for advice from your health care provider.
lead in water
If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems,
especially for pregnant women and young children.
Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and components
associated with service lines and home plumbing.
The City of Manteca is responsible for providing high quality
drinking water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in plumbing
components. When your water has
been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead
exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to 2 minutes before using water
for drinking or cooking. If you
are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to have your water
tested. Information on lead in
drinking water, testing methods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure
is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline or at
http://www.epa.gov/safewater/lead.
CONTAMINANTS MONITORED
The tables list all of the drinking water contaminants
that were detected during the most recent sampling for the constituent.
The presence of these contaminants in the water does not necessarily
indicate that the water poses a health risk.
We routinely perform additional monitoring for contaminants that
could pose health concerns. The
Department allows us to monitor some contaminants less than once per year
because the concentrations do not change frequently. Some of our data,
though representative, are more than a year old.
*SUMMARY
INFORMATION REGARDING ARSENIC LEVELS EXCEEDING THE FEDERAL MCL
What should I do?
You do
not need to use an alternative (e.g. , bottled) water supply.
However, if you have specific health
concerns, consult your doctor.
What does this mean? This
is not an immediate risk. If it
had been, you would have been notified immediately. However,
some
people who drink water containing arsenic in excess of the MCL over many
years may experience skin damage or circulatory system problems, and may
have an increased risk of getting cancer.
What happened?
The
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) reduced the Arsenic MCL from 50 ppb
down to 10 ppb. On November 28,
2008, the Department adopted the revised arsenic MCL level.
What was
done?
The City of
HOW TO READ THE FOLLOWING TABLES
The column marked “Range of Detected Levels” shows the
lowest, average and highest test results in our wells during the most recent
monitoring. The “Average Detected Level” is determined from all test results
from the most recent monitoring. “Typical Source of Contaminant” indicates
where a substance usually originates. Other columns refer to:
·
Maximum Contaminant Level
(MCL): The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water.
Primary MCLs are set as close to the PHGs (or MCLGs) as is economically and
technologically feasible. Secondary MCLs are set to protect the odor, taste,
and appearance of drinking water.
·
Maximum Contaminant Level Goal
(MCLG): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no
known or expected risk to health. MCLGs are set by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.
·
Public
Health Goal (PHG): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which
there is no known or expected risk to health.
PHGs are set by the California Environmental Protection Agency.
·
Maximum
Residual Disinfectant Level (MRDL):
The highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water.
There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary
for control of microbial contaminants.
·
Maximum
Residual Disinfectant Level Goal (MRDLG):
The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no
known or expected risk to health.
MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to
control microbial contaminants.
·
Primary
Drinking Water Standards: MCLs for contaminants that affect health along
with their monitoring and reporting requirements and water treatment
requirements.
·
Secondary Drinking Water Standards (SDWS): MCLs for contaminants that affect
taste, order or appearance of the drinking water.
Contaminants with SDWS do not affect the health at their MCL levels.
·
Treatment Technique: A required
process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water.
·
Regulatory Action Level: The concentration of a
contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements
that a water system must follow.
|
Table
1 - Source Water Quality Monitoring
|
||||||||
|
Detection of Contaminants with a Primary
Drinking Water Standard Sampled in 2007-2010 |
||||||||
|
Contaminant |
Units |
MCL |
PHG
or
(MCLG) |
Range of Detected Levels |
Typical Source of Contaminant |
|||
|
Groundwater |
Surface Water |
|||||||
|
Average |
Range |
Average |
Range |
|||||
Arsenic*
|
ppb |
10 |
0.004 |
11 |
5-21 |
ND |
NA |
Erosion of natural deposits |
Barium
|
ppm |
1 |
2 |
0.13 |
0.08-0.25 |
ND |
NA |
Erosion of natural deposits. |
|
Dibromo- chloropropane
(DBCP) |
ppt |
200 |
1.7 |
7 |
ND-106 |
ND
(2005) |
NA |
Banned nematocide that may
still be present in soils due to
runoff/leaching from former use on vineyard
and fruit trees. |
|
Ethylene
Dibromide (EDB) |
ppt |
50 |
10 |
2 |
ND-28 |
ND |
NA |
Banned
nematocide that may still be present in
soils due to runoff and leaching from grain
and fruit crops. |
Fluoride
|
ppm |
2 |
1 |
0.14 |
0.10-0.21 |
ND |
NA |
Erosion of natural deposits. |
|
Gross Alpha Activity
(1) |
pCi/L |
15 |
(0) |
6 |
ND-13 |
ND
(2006) |
NA |
Erosion of natural
deposits. |
|
Nitrate
(2) |
ppm |
45 |
45 |
26 |
4.1-44.9 |
ND |
NA |
Runoff
and leaching from fertilizer use; erosion of
natural deposits. |
|
Total chromium |
ppb |
50 |
(100) |
1.4 |
ND-6.5 |
ND |
NA |
Discharges from steel and pulp mills and
chrome plating; erosion of natural deposits |
|
Uranium |
pCi/L |
20 |
0.43 |
5.4 |
3.1-8.0 |
ND |
NA |
Erosion of natural deposits. |
|
Detection of Contaminants
with a Secondary Drinking Water Standard
Sampled in 2009-2010 |
||||||||
|
Chloride |
ppm |
500 |
None |
20 |
8-73 |
9.1 |
NA |
Runoff/leaching from natural
deposits |
|
Sulfate |
ppm |
500 |
None |
20 |
11-40 |
2.0 |
NA |
Runoff/leaching from natural
deposits. |
|
Sampling Results for Sodium and Hardness
Sampled in 2008-2010 |
||||||||
|
Sodium |
ppm |
None |
None |
31 |
12-47 |
4 |
NA |
Naturally occurring in ground and surface
waters. |
|
Hardness |
ppm |
None |
None |
166 |
79-250 |
46 |
NA |
Naturally occurring in ground and surface
waters. |
|
Detection of Unregulated Contaminants
Sampled in 2009 and 2010 |
|||||||
|
Vanadium |
ppb |
Notification Level
50 |
38 |
29-50 |
ND |
NA |
Health Effects Language
The babies of some pregnant women who drink
water containing vanadium in excess of the
notification level may have an increased
risk of developmental effects, based on
studies in laboratory animals. |
UNITS USED IN REPORTING
·
ppm =
parts per million
· ppt = parts
per trillion
· ND =
None Detected
·
NS = Not Sampled
· NA = Not
Applicable
·
ppb = parts per billion · pCi/L stands for
picocuries per liter and is a radioactivity measurement
·
*
MCL violation of the Federal Arsenic
Rule, See Page 2 for more details
Notes from Table 1:
(1)
When a well exceeds a certain level of detected Gross Alpha Activity,
the well water is tested for Uranium.
If the detected level of a water source is below the Gross Alpha and
Uranium MCL, then the water source is considered safe and is left in
service.
(2)
More than half of the City wells have levels of Nitrates
below 23 ppm and only require monitoring once every year.
Those wells with detected levels of Nitrate between 23 and 45 ppm are
monitored quarterly to maintain an accurate picture of the Nitrate levels.
Any well that monitors a level of Nitrate above 45 ppm would be
immediately retested and removed from service if the average of the two
tests was above 45 ppm. Further
testing and evaluations would then be performed.
|
Table
2 – Distribution System Water Quality
Monitoring |
||||||||||||||||
|
Sampling Results Showing the
Detection of Coliform Bacteria
|
||||||||||||||||
Microbial
Contaminants
|
Highest percentage of positive samples in a month |
Number of months in violation |
MCL |
MCLG |
Typical Source of Microbe |
|||||||||||
|
Total Coliform Bacteria |
1.3% |
0 |
5% of
total monthly samples |
0 |
Naturally present in the
environment |
|||||||||||
|
Sampling Results Showing the Detection
of Disinfectant
Residual and Disinfection By-Products |
||||||||||||||||
|
Contaminant |
Date of Last Test Result |
Units |
MCL [MRDL] |
PHG (MCLG) [MRDL] |
Range of Detected Levels |
Typical Source of Contaminant
|
||||||||||
|
Minimum |
**Average |
Maximum |
||||||||||||||
Chlorine
|
December 2010 |
ppm |
[4.0] |
[4.0] |
0.79 |
0.88 |
1.04 |
Drinking water disinfectant
added for treatment |
||||||||
TTHMs
(Total Trihalomethane)
|
October 2010 |
ppb |
80 |
None |
0 |
33 |
63 |
By-product of drinking
water chlorination. |
||||||||
Halocetic Acids
|
October 2010 |
ppb |
60 |
None |
0 |
23 |
41 |
By-product of drinking
water chlorination. |
||||||||
|
**
The average is the highest running annual
average reported in four quarters (every 3
months) of monitoring.
Sampling Results Showing the
Detection of Lead and Copper |
||||||||||||||||
|
Contaminant |
Date of Last Test Result |
Units |
Action Level |
MCLG |
90th Percentile Level Detected |
Number of Sites Exceeding Action Level |
Number of Samples Collected |
Typical Source of Contaminant |
||||||||
|
Lead |
July
2009 |
ppb |
15 |
2 |
1.4 |
0 |
36 |
Internal corrosion of household water
plumbing systems; erosion of natural
deposits. |
||||||||
|
Copper |
July
2009 |
ppm |
1.3 |
0.17 |
0.11 |
0 |
36 |
Internal corrosion of household water
plumbing systems; erosion of natural
deposits. |
||||||||
Table 3 – Sampling Results Showing Treatment Of Surface Water Sources
|
|
|
Treatment Technique
(3)
(Type of approved filtration technology
used) |
Ultrafiltration Membrane
|
|
Turbidity Performance
Standards
(4)
(that must be met through the water
treatment process) |
Turbidity of the filtered
water must:
1
- Be less than or equal to
0.1 NTU in 95% of measurements in a month.
2 - Not to exceed 1.0 NTU any time. |
|
Lowest monthly percentage of samples that
met Turbidity Performance Standard No. 1. |
98.4% |
|
Highest single turbidity measurement during
the year |
0.087 NTU |
|
Number of violations of any surface water
treatment requirements |
Zero |
UNITS USED IN REPORTING
·
ppm =
parts per million
· ppt = parts
per trillion
· ND = None Detected
· NS =
Not Sampled · NA = Not Applicable
·
ppb =
parts per billion
· pCi/L stands
for picocuries per liter and is a radioactivity measurement
·
NTU =
Nephelometric Turbidity Unit
Notes from Table 3:
(3)
A required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking
water.
(4)
Turbidity (measured in NTU) is a measurement of the cloudiness of water and
is a good indicator of water quality and filtration performance.
Turbidity results which meet performance standards are considered to
be in compliance with filtration requirements.

